Bitpanda logo
Enterprisenew
Log in
Sign-up
Bitpanda logo

Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.

Siacoin

Siacoin price (SC)

Buying Siacoin (SC) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current SC value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about SC.

Buying Siacoin (SC) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current SC value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about SC.

€0.00074

-€0.00002-3.21 %
-€0.00002-3.21 %



This converter shows values for info only and doesn’t reflect actual transaction rates.

Last updated: 15/10/2026, 14:20:00

paypalvisamastercard

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Price of Siacoin today

Review the latest Siacoin price movements. Here is today’s trend at a glance: -3.21 %

Siacoin price statistics

Loading price statistics...

Siacoin market stats

  • Daily high

    €0.00

  • Daily low

    €0.00

  • Volatility (1M)

    25.19%

  • 52W High

    €0.00

  • 52W Low

    €0.00

  • Market cap

    €41.71M

Siacoin conversion table

1 EUR

1343.15 SC

5 EUR

6715.74 SC

10 EUR

13431.47 SC

15 EUR

20147.21 SC

20 EUR

26862.95 SC

25 EUR

33578.68 SC

1 Siacoin (SC) to Us Dollar (USD)

USD 0.00

1 Siacoin (SC) to Swiss Franc (CHF)

CHF 0.00

1 Siacoin (SC) to British Pound Sterling (GBP)

GBP 0.00

1 Siacoin (SC) to Turkish Lira (TRY)

TRY 0.04

1 Siacoin (SC) to Polish Zloty (PLN)

PLN 0.00

1 Siacoin (SC) to Hungarian Forint (HUF)

HUF 0.27

1 Siacoin (SC) to Czech Koruna (CZK)

CZK 0.02

1 Siacoin (SC) to Norwegian Krone (NOK)

NOK 0.01

1 Siacoin (SC) to Swedish Krona (SEK)

SEK 0.01

1 Siacoin (SC) to Danish Krone (DKK)

DKK 0.01

1 Siacoin (SC) to Romanian Leu (RON)

RON 0.00

About Siacoin (SC)

The Sia network delivers decentralised data storage that seeks to compete with major cloud storage providers. Files stored on Sia are split into 30 encrypted segments, with each one uploaded to a unique host for redundancy. The agreements between uploaders and hosts are recorded on Sia's blockchain and enforced using smart contracts. The SC token acts as the method of payment on the network, with renters paying hosts using SC, and hosts locking SC in smart contracts as collateral.

Explore other cryptocurrencies

Highest market cap

Cryptos with the highest market capitalisation

  • 600+ cryptoassets

    Buy, sell or swap cryptoassets from the UK's widest range of cryptoassets, including crypto indices and staking.

    Learn more
  • Invest your way

    Explore our exciting features, including staking, savings plans, limit orders, and more.

    Learn more
  • Safe and secure

    Safety is at the core of Bitpanda’s identity. With cutting-edge technology and a commitment to transparency, we give you the peace of mind to invest with confidence.

    Learn more
  • ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.

    Name

    Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH, Bitpanda GmbH

    Relevant legal entity identifier

    9845005X9B7N610K0093, 5493007WZ7IFULIL8G21

    Name of the crypto-asset

    Siacoin

    Consensus Mechanism

    Siacoin employs a Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism to secure its decentralized storage network. Core Components: Proof of Work (PoW): Miners validate transactions and secure the blockchain by solving computational puzzles using the PoW model. Blake2b Hashing Algorithm: The network relies on the Blake2b hashing algorithm, optimized for efficient and secure mining operations. ASIC Mining: Mining on the Siacoin network is most efficient using Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) tailored for the Blake2b algorithm, promoting network stability through specialized hardware.

    Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees

    Siacoin incentivizes miners and storage hosts while ensuring low-cost, secure transactions and storage services. Incentive Mechanisms: Block Rewards: Miners earn SC as rewards for validating transactions and successfully adding new blocks to the blockchain, encouraging continuous participation in network security. Transaction Fees: Users pay transaction fees in SC for sending payments and interacting with the network. These fees compensate miners for processing transactions and maintaining network integrity. Host Collateral: Storage hosts must lock up SC as collateral when entering storage contracts. This ensures reliability and motivates hosts to fulfill their storage commitments, enhancing trust within the network.

    Beginning of the period

    2024-09-09

    End of the period

    2025-09-09

    Energy consumption

    87614336.89081 (kWh/a)

    Energy consumption resources and methodologies

    For the calculation of energy consumptions, the so called 'top-down' approach is being used, within which an economic calculation of the miners is assumed. Miners are persons or devices that actively participate in the proof-of-work consensus mechanism. The miners are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. Hardware is pre-selected based on the consensus mechanism's hash algorithm: Blake. A current profitability threshold is determined on the basis of the revenue and cost structure for mining operations. Only Hardware above the profitability threshold is considered for the network. The energy consumption of the network can be determined by taking into account the distribution for the hardware, the efficiency levels for operating the hardware and on-chain information regarding the miners' revenue opportunities. If significant use of merge mining is known, this is taken into account. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts.

    Renewable energy consumption

    29.306425042 (%)

    Energy intensity

    4.80079 (kWh)

    Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions - Controlled

    0.00000 (tCO2e/a)

    Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions - Purchased

    36096.76172 (tCO2e/a)

    GHG intensity

    1.97790 (kgCO2e)

    Key energy sources and methodologies

    To determine the proportion of renewable energy usage, the locations of the nodes are to be determined using public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. If no information is available on the geographic distribution of the nodes, reference networks are used which are comparable in terms of their incentivization structure and consensus mechanism. This geo-information is merged with public information from Our World in Data, see citation. The intensity is calculated as the marginal energy cost wrt. one more transaction. Ember (2025); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2024) - with major processing by Our World in Data. “Share of electricity generated by renewables - Ember and Energy Institute” [dataset]. Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data Europe”; Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data”; Energy Institute, “Statistical Review of World Energy” [original data]. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-electricity-renewables.

    Key GHG sources and methodologies

    To determine the GHG Emissions, the locations of the nodes are to be determined using public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. If no information is available on the geographic distribution of the nodes, reference networks are used which are comparable in terms of their incentivization structure and consensus mechanism. This geo-information is merged with public information from Our World in Data, see citation. The intensity is calculated as the marginal emission wrt. one more transaction. Ember (2025); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2024) - with major processing by Our World in Data. “Carbon intensity of electricity generation - Ember and Energy Institute” [dataset]. Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data Europe”; Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data”; Energy Institute, “Statistical Review of World Energy” [original data]. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-intensity-electricity Licenced under CC BY 4.0.

  • Description

    These tokens power Decentralised Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN). They facilitate marketplaces for resources like file storage, GPU computing power, or wireless coverage. The token acts as the medium of exchange between providers of the hardware and users of the service.

    Risks

    Supply and demand imbalance. The token economics of these projects rely on a balance between hardware providers (supply) and actual users (demand). Often, the supply of resources grows faster than the demand from paying customers. This can lead to an oversupply of the token as providers sell their earnings, suppressing the price permanently.

    Technical barriers and competition. These networks compete directly with centralised giants like Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Google Cloud. Decentralised alternatives are often slower, more complex to use, and technically demanding.