Bitpanda logo
Enterprisenew
Log in
Sign-up
Bitpanda logo
Arbitrum

Arbitrum price (ARB)

Buying Arbitrum (ARB) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current ARB value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about ARB.

Arbitrum

Arbitrum price (ARB)

Buying Arbitrum (ARB) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current ARB value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about ARB.

€0.1175

-€0.0023-1.88 %
-€0.0023-1.88 %



This converter shows values for info only and doesn’t reflect actual transaction rates.

Last updated: 14/09/2026, 15:30:00

paypalvisamastercard

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Price of Arbitrum today

Review the latest Arbitrum price movements. Here is today’s trend at a glance: -1.88 %

Arbitrum price statistics

Loading price statistics...

Arbitrum market stats

  • Daily high

    €0.12

  • Daily low

    €0.11

  • Volatility (1M)

    51.37%

  • 52W High

    €0.45

  • 52W Low

    €0.06

  • Market cap

    €705.87M

Arbitrum conversion table

1 EUR

8.51 ARB

5 EUR

42.57 ARB

10 EUR

85.14 ARB

15 EUR

127.71 ARB

20 EUR

170.28 ARB

25 EUR

212.86 ARB

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Us Dollar (USD)

USD 0.14

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Swiss Franc (CHF)

CHF 0.11

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to British Pound Sterling (GBP)

GBP 0.10

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Turkish Lira (TRY)

TRY 6.60

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Polish Zloty (PLN)

PLN 0.51

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Hungarian Forint (HUF)

HUF 42.72

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Czech Koruna (CZK)

CZK 2.85

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Norwegian Krone (NOK)

NOK 1.27

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Swedish Krona (SEK)

SEK 1.32

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Danish Krone (DKK)

DKK 0.88

1 Arbitrum (ARB) to Romanian Leu (RON)

RON 0.62

About Arbitrum (ARB)

Arbitrum is an L2 scaling solution for Ethereum. Its native token, ARB, is used to vote on Arbitrum DAO governance proposals, allowing ARB holders to participate in shaping Arbitrum's future. Arbitrum’s creators describe it as a protocol that makes Ethereum transactions faster and cheaper.

Explore other cryptocurrencies

Highest market cap

Cryptos with the highest market capitalisation

  • 600+ cryptoassets

    Buy, sell or swap cryptoassets from the UK's widest range of cryptoassets, including crypto indices and staking.

    Learn more
  • Invest your way

    Explore our exciting features, including staking, savings plans, limit orders, and more.

    Learn more
  • Safe and secure

    Safety is at the core of Bitpanda’s identity. With cutting-edge technology and a commitment to transparency, we give you the peace of mind to invest with confidence.

    Learn more
  • ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.

    Name

    Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH, Bitpanda GmbH

    Relevant legal entity identifier

    9845005X9B7N610K0093, 5493007WZ7IFULIL8G21

    Name of the crypto-asset

    Arbitrum

    Consensus Mechanism

    Arbitrum is present on the following networks: Arbitrum, Ethereum. Arbitrum is a Layer 2 solution on top of Ethereum that uses Optimistic Rollups to enhance scalability and reduce transaction costs. It assumes that transactions are valid by default and only verifies them if there's a challenge (optimistic): Core Components: • Sequencer: Orders transactions and creates batches for processing. • Bridge: Facilitates asset transfers between Arbitrum and Ethereum. • Fraud Proofs: Protect against invalid transactions through an interactive verification process. Verification Process: 1. Transaction Submission: Users submit transactions to the Arbitrum Sequencer, which orders and batches them. 2. State Commitment: These batches are submitted to Ethereum with a state commitment. 3. Challenge Period: Validators have a specific period to challenge the state if they suspect fraud. 4. Dispute Resolution: If a challenge occurs, the dispute is resolved through an iterative process to identify the fraudulent transaction. The final operation is executed on Ethereum to determine the correct state. 5. Rollback and Penalties: If fraud is proven, the state is rolled back, and the dishonest party is penalized. Security and Efficiency: The combination of the Sequencer, bridge, and interactive fraud proofs ensures that the system remains secure and efficient. By minimizing on-chain data and leveraging off-chain computations, Arbitrum can provide high throughput and low fees. The crypto-asset's Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, introduced with The Merge in 2022, replaces mining with validator staking. Validators must stake at least 32 ETH every block a validator is randomly chosen to propose the next block. Once proposed the other validators verify the blocks integrity. The network operates on a slot and epoch system, where a new block is proposed every 12 seconds, and finalization occurs after two epochs (~12.8 minutes) using Casper-FFG. The Beacon Chain coordinates validators, while the fork-choice rule (LMD-GHOST) ensures the chain follows the heaviest accumulated validator votes. Validators earn rewards for proposing and verifying blocks, but face slashing for malicious behavior or inactivity. PoS aims to improve energy efficiency, security, and scalability, with future upgrades like Proto-Danksharding enhancing transaction efficiency.

    Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees

    Arbitrum is present on the following networks: Arbitrum, Ethereum. Arbitrum One, a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, employs several incentive mechanisms to ensure the security and integrity of transactions on its network. The key mechanisms include: 1. Validators and Sequencers: o Sequencers are responsible for ordering transactions and creating batches that are processed off-chain. They play a critical role in maintaining the efficiency and throughput of the network. o Validators monitor the sequencers' actions and ensure that transactions are processed correctly. Validators verify the state transitions and ensure that no invalid transactions are included in the batches. 2. Fraud Proofs: o Assumption of Validity: Transactions processed off-chain are assumed to be valid. This allows for quick transaction finality and high throughput. o Challenge Period: There is a predefined period during which anyone can challenge the validity of a transaction by submitting a fraud proof. This mechanism acts as a deterrent against malicious behavior. o Dispute Resolution: If a challenge is raised, an interactive verification process is initiated to pinpoint the exact step where fraud occurred. If the challenge is valid, the fraudulent transaction is reverted, and the dishonest actor is penalized. 3. Economic Incentives: o Rewards for Honest Behavior: Participants in the network, such as validators and sequencers, are incentivized through rewards for performing their duties honestly and efficiently. These rewards come from transaction fees and potentially other protocol incentives. o Penalties for Malicious Behavior: Participants who engage in dishonest behavior or submit invalid transactions are penalized. This can include slashing of staked tokens or other forms of economic penalties, which serve to discourage malicious actions. Fees on the Arbitrum One Blockchain 1. Transaction Fees: o Layer 2 Fees: Users pay fees for transactions processed on the Layer 2 network. These fees are typically lower than Ethereum mainnet fees due to the reduced computational load on the main chain. o Arbitrum Transaction Fee: A fee is charged for each transaction processed by the sequencer. This fee covers the cost of processing the transaction and ensuring its inclusion in a batch. 2. L1 Data Fees: o Posting Batches to Ethereum: Periodically, the state updates from the Layer 2 transactions are posted to the Ethereum mainnet as calldata. This involves a fee, known as the L1 data fee, which accounts for the gas required to publish these state updates on Ethereum. o Cost Sharing: Because transactions are batched, the fixed costs of posting state updates to Ethereum are spread across multiple transactions, making it more cost-effective for users. The crypto-asset's PoS system secures transactions through validator incentives and economic penalties. Validators stake at least 32 ETH and earn rewards for proposing blocks, attesting to valid ones, and participating in sync committees. Rewards are paid in newly issued ETH and transaction fees. Under EIP-1559, transaction fees consist of a base fee, which is burned to reduce supply, and an optional priority fee (tip) paid to validators. Validators face slashing if they act maliciously and incur penalties for inactivity. This system aims to increase security by aligning incentives while making the crypto-asset's fee structure more predictable and deflationary during high network activity.

    Beginning of the period

    2024-09-09

    End of the period

    2025-09-09

    Energy consumption

    1262.39410 (kWh/a)

  • Description

    Layer-2 networks, or 'rollups', are protocols built on top of a Layer-1 blockchain such as Ethereum. They are designed to process transactions off the main chain to increase speed and reduce costs while inheriting the security guarantees of the Layer-1. Users utilise Layer-2s to access decentralised finance (DeFi) and gaming applications with lower fees. Appchains are application-specific blockchains that may function similarly or as standalone chains with specific bridges.

    Risks

    Dependency on Layer-1. Layer-2 networks are entirely dependent on their underlying Layer-1 for finality and security. If the Layer-1 network suffers an outage, a reorganisation, or a censorship attack, the Layer-2 network will be directly affected. The Layer-2 cannot exist or secure funds without the liveness and security of the Layer-1.

    Sequencer Centralisation. Many Layer-2s currently rely on a single centralised 'sequencer' to order and process transactions. This sequencer is often operated by the project development team and creates a single point of failure. If the sequencer goes offline, the network may halt and prevent you from transacting. If the operator acts maliciously, they could potentially censor your transactions or exploit the order of trades for profit (MEV). While many Layer-2s plan to decentralise their sequencers, this remains a future roadmap item rather than a current reality for many.

    Bridge Security and Exit Timelines. To use a Layer-2, you must 'bridge' assets from the Layer-1. The smart contracts that hold these bridged assets are frequent targets for exploits. Additionally, moving funds back from a Layer-2 to the Layer-1 can be subject to long waiting periods. For 'optimistic rollups', this withdrawal period can last roughly seven days to allow for fraud proofs to be challenged. You may be unable to access your funds on the main chain during this time unless you use third-party liquidity providers, which introduce their own risks and fees.

    Upgradeability and Key Controls. Many Layer-2 networks are still in an experimental phase and developers often retain 'admin keys' or 'multisig controls' that allow them to upgrade the smart contracts instantly. While this allows for quick bug fixes, it also means the team could theoretically alter the protocol in a way that compromises user funds without community consent or prior warning.

    Data Availability Risks. Layer-2s must post transaction data to the Layer-1 to ensure security and state reconstruction. If the Layer-2 fails to post this data correctly, or if the data becomes unavailable due to technical failures, users may be unable to reconstruct the state of the Layer-2 and could lose access to their funds permanently.