Bitpanda logo
Enterprisenew
Log in
Sign-up
Bitpanda logo
Polygon

Polygon price (POL)

Buying Polygon (POL) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current POL value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about POL.

Buying Polygon (POL) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current POL value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about POL.

€0.0993

€0.0049+5.14 %
€0.0049+5.14 %



This converter shows values for info only and doesn’t reflect actual transaction rates.

Last updated: 25/09/2026, 19:00:00

paypalvisamastercard

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Price of Polygon today

Review the latest Polygon price movements. Here is today’s trend at a glance: +5.14 %

Polygon price statistics

Loading price statistics...

Polygon market stats

  • Daily high

    €0.10

  • Daily low

    €0.09

  • Volatility (1M)

    23.38%

  • 52W High

    €0.22

  • 52W Low

    €0.06

  • Market cap

    €1.06B

Polygon conversion table

1 EUR

10.07 POL

5 EUR

50.35 POL

10 EUR

100.70 POL

15 EUR

151.05 POL

20 EUR

201.40 POL

25 EUR

251.75 POL

1 Polygon (POL) to Us Dollar (USD)

USD 0.11

1 Polygon (POL) to Swiss Franc (CHF)

CHF 0.09

1 Polygon (POL) to British Pound Sterling (GBP)

GBP 0.09

1 Polygon (POL) to Turkish Lira (TRY)

TRY 5.54

1 Polygon (POL) to Polish Zloty (PLN)

PLN 0.43

1 Polygon (POL) to Hungarian Forint (HUF)

HUF 36.24

1 Polygon (POL) to Czech Koruna (CZK)

CZK 2.42

1 Polygon (POL) to Norwegian Krone (NOK)

NOK 1.07

1 Polygon (POL) to Swedish Krona (SEK)

SEK 1.12

1 Polygon (POL) to Danish Krone (DKK)

DKK 0.74

1 Polygon (POL) to Romanian Leu (RON)

RON 0.52

About Polygon (POL)

Explore other cryptocurrencies

Highest market cap

Cryptos with the highest market capitalisation

  • 600+ cryptoassets

    Buy, sell or swap cryptoassets from the UK's widest range of cryptoassets, including crypto indices and staking.

    Learn more
  • Invest your way

    Explore our exciting features, including staking, savings plans, limit orders, and more.

    Learn more
  • Safe and secure

    Safety is at the core of Bitpanda’s identity. With cutting-edge technology and a commitment to transparency, we give you the peace of mind to invest with confidence.

    Learn more
  • ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.

    Name

    Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH, Bitpanda GmbH

    Relevant legal entity identifier

    9845005X9B7N610K0093, 5493007WZ7IFULIL8G21

    Name of the crypto-asset

    Polygon POL

    Consensus Mechanism

    Polygon POL is present on the following networks: Ethereum, Polygon. The crypto-asset's Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, introduced with The Merge in 2022, replaces mining with validator staking. Validators must stake at least 32 ETH every block a validator is randomly chosen to propose the next block. Once proposed the other validators verify the blocks integrity. The network operates on a slot and epoch system, where a new block is proposed every 12 seconds, and finalization occurs after two epochs (~12.8 minutes) using Casper-FFG. The Beacon Chain coordinates validators, while the fork-choice rule (LMD-GHOST) ensures the chain follows the heaviest accumulated validator votes. Validators earn rewards for proposing and verifying blocks, but face slashing for malicious behavior or inactivity. PoS aims to improve energy efficiency, security, and scalability, with future upgrades like Proto-Danksharding enhancing transaction efficiency. Polygon, formerly known as Matic Network, is a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum that employs a hybrid consensus mechanism. Here’s a detailed explanation of how Polygon achieves consensus: Core Concepts 1. Proof of Stake (PoS): Validator Selection: Validators on the Polygon network are selected based on the number of MATIC tokens they have staked. The more tokens staked, the higher the chance of being selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks. Delegation: Token holders who do not wish to run a validator node can delegate their MATIC tokens to validators. Delegators share in the rewards earned by validators. 2. Plasma Chains: Off-Chain Scaling: Plasma is a framework for creating child chains that operate alongside the main Ethereum chain. These child chains can process transactions off-chain and submit only the final state to the Ethereum main chain, significantly increasing throughput and reducing congestion. Fraud Proofs: Plasma uses a fraud-proof mechanism to ensure the security of off-chain transactions. If a fraudulent transaction is detected, it can be challenged and reverted. Consensus Process 3. Transaction Validation: Transactions are first validated by validators who have staked MATIC tokens. These validators confirm the validity of transactions and include them in blocks. 4. Block Production: Proposing and Voting: Validators propose new blocks based on their staked tokens and participate in a voting process to reach consensus on the next block. The block with the majority of votes is added to the blockchain. Checkpointing: Polygon uses periodic checkpointing, where snapshots of the Polygon sidechain are submitted to the Ethereum main chain. This process ensures the security and finality of transactions on the Polygon network. 5. Plasma Framework: Child Chains: Transactions can be processed on child chains created using the Plasma framework. These transactions are validated off-chain and only the final state is submitted to the Ethereum main chain. Fraud Proofs: If a fraudulent transaction occurs, it can be challenged within a certain period using fraud proofs. This mechanism ensures the integrity of off-chain transactions. Security and Economic Incentives 6. Incentives for Validators: Staking Rewards: Validators earn rewards for staking MATIC tokens and participating in the consensus process. These rewards are distributed in MATIC tokens and are proportional to the amount staked and the performance of the validator. Transaction Fees: Validators also earn a portion of the transaction fees paid by users. This provides an additional financial incentive to maintain the network’s integrity and efficiency. 7. Delegation: Shared Rewards: Delegators earn a share of the rewards earned by the validators they delegate to. This encourages more token holders to participate in securing the network by choosing reliable validators. 8. Economic Security: Slashing: Validators can be penalized for malicious behavior or failure to perform their duties. This penalty, known as slashing, involves the loss of a portion of their staked tokens, ensuring that validators act in the best interest of the network.

    Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees

    Polygon POL is present on the following networks: Ethereum, Polygon. The crypto-asset's PoS system secures transactions through validator incentives and economic penalties. Validators stake at least 32 ETH and earn rewards for proposing blocks, attesting to valid ones, and participating in sync committees. Rewards are paid in newly issued ETH and transaction fees. Under EIP-1559, transaction fees consist of a base fee, which is burned to reduce supply, and an optional priority fee (tip) paid to validators. Validators face slashing if they act maliciously and incur penalties for inactivity. This system aims to increase security by aligning incentives while making the crypto-asset's fee structure more predictable and deflationary during high network activity. Polygon uses a combination of Proof of Stake (PoS) and the Plasma framework to ensure network security, incentivize participation, and maintain transaction integrity. Incentive Mechanisms 1. Validators: Staking Rewards: Validators on Polygon secure the network by staking MATIC tokens. They are selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks based on the number of tokens they have staked. Validators earn rewards in the form of newly minted MATIC tokens and transaction fees for their services. Block Production: Validators are responsible for proposing and voting on new blocks. The selected validator proposes a block, and other validators verify and validate it. Validators are incentivized to act honestly and efficiently to earn rewards and avoid penalties. Checkpointing: Validators periodically submit checkpoints to the Ethereum main chain, ensuring the security and finality of transactions processed on Polygon. This provides an additional layer of security by leveraging Ethereum's robustness. 2. Delegators: Delegation: Token holders who do not wish to run a validator node can delegate their MATIC tokens to trusted validators. Delegators earn a portion of the rewards earned by the validators, incentivizing them to choose reliable and performant validators. Shared Rewards: Rewards earned by validators are shared with delegators, based on the proportion of tokens delegated. This system encourages widespread participation and enhances the network's decentralization. 3. Economic Security: Slashing: Validators can be penalized through a process called slashing if they engage in malicious behavior or fail to perform their duties correctly. This includes double-signing or going offline for extended periods. Slashing results in the loss of a portion of the staked tokens, acting as a strong deterrent against dishonest actions. Bond Requirements: Validators are required to bond a significant amount of MATIC tokens to participate in the consensus process, ensuring they have a vested interest in maintaining network security and integrity. Fees on the Polygon Blockchain 4. Transaction Fees: Low Fees: One of Polygon's main advantages is its low transaction fees compared to the Ethereum main chain. The fees are paid in MATIC tokens and are designed to be affordable to encourage high transaction throughput and user adoption. Dynamic Fees: Fees on Polygon can vary depending on network congestion and transaction complexity. However, they remain significantly lower than those on Ethereum, making Polygon an attractive option for users and developers. 5. Smart Contract Fees: Deployment and Execution Costs: Deploying and interacting with smart contracts on Polygon incurs fees based on the computational resources required. These fees are also paid in MATIC tokens and are much lower than on Ethereum, making it cost-effective for developers to build and maintain decentralized applications (dApps) on Polygon. 6. Plasma Framework: State Transfers and Withdrawals: The Plasma framework allows for off-chain processing of transactions, which are periodically batched and committed to the Ethereum main chain. Fees associated with these processes are also paid in MATIC tokens, and they help reduce the overall cost of using the network.

    Beginning of the period

    2024-09-09

    End of the period

    2025-09-09

    Energy consumption

    92679.93339 (kWh/a)

  • Description

    Layer-2 networks, or 'rollups', are protocols built on top of a Layer-1 blockchain such as Ethereum. They are designed to process transactions off the main chain to increase speed and reduce costs while inheriting the security guarantees of the Layer-1. Users utilise Layer-2s to access decentralised finance (DeFi) and gaming applications with lower fees. Appchains are application-specific blockchains that may function similarly or as standalone chains with specific bridges.

    Risks

    Dependency on Layer-1. Layer-2 networks are entirely dependent on their underlying Layer-1 for finality and security. If the Layer-1 network suffers an outage, a reorganisation, or a censorship attack, the Layer-2 network will be directly affected. The Layer-2 cannot exist or secure funds without the liveness and security of the Layer-1.

    Sequencer Centralisation. Many Layer-2s currently rely on a single centralised 'sequencer' to order and process transactions. This sequencer is often operated by the project development team and creates a single point of failure. If the sequencer goes offline, the network may halt and prevent you from transacting. If the operator acts maliciously, they could potentially censor your transactions or exploit the order of trades for profit (MEV). While many Layer-2s plan to decentralise their sequencers, this remains a future roadmap item rather than a current reality for many.

    Bridge Security and Exit Timelines. To use a Layer-2, you must 'bridge' assets from the Layer-1. The smart contracts that hold these bridged assets are frequent targets for exploits. Additionally, moving funds back from a Layer-2 to the Layer-1 can be subject to long waiting periods. For 'optimistic rollups', this withdrawal period can last roughly seven days to allow for fraud proofs to be challenged. You may be unable to access your funds on the main chain during this time unless you use third-party liquidity providers, which introduce their own risks and fees.

    Upgradeability and Key Controls. Many Layer-2 networks are still in an experimental phase and developers often retain 'admin keys' or 'multisig controls' that allow them to upgrade the smart contracts instantly. While this allows for quick bug fixes, it also means the team could theoretically alter the protocol in a way that compromises user funds without community consent or prior warning.

    Data Availability Risks. Layer-2s must post transaction data to the Layer-1 to ensure security and state reconstruction. If the Layer-2 fails to post this data correctly, or if the data becomes unavailable due to technical failures, users may be unable to reconstruct the state of the Layer-2 and could lose access to their funds permanently.