Bitpanda logo
Enterprisenew
Log in
Sign-up
Bitpanda logo
Moonbeam

Moonbeam price (GLMR)

Buying Moonbeam (GLMR) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current GLMR value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about GLMR.

Buying Moonbeam (GLMR) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current GLMR value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about GLMR.

€0.0067

-€0.0021-24.13 %
-€0.0021-24.13 %



This converter shows values for info only and doesn’t reflect actual transaction rates.

Last updated: 28/09/2026, 10:00:00

paypalvisamastercard

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Price of Moonbeam today

Review the latest Moonbeam price movements. Here is today’s trend at a glance: -24.13 %

Moonbeam price statistics

Loading price statistics...

Moonbeam market stats

  • Daily high

    €0.01

  • Daily low

    €0.01

  • Volatility (1M)

    24.81%

  • 52W High

    €0.05

  • 52W Low

    €0.00

  • Market cap

    €6.68M

Moonbeam conversion table

1 EUR

150.12 GLMR

5 EUR

750.62 GLMR

10 EUR

1501.24 GLMR

15 EUR

2251.87 GLMR

20 EUR

3002.49 GLMR

25 EUR

3753.11 GLMR

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Us Dollar (USD)

USD 0.01

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Swiss Franc (CHF)

CHF 0.01

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to British Pound Sterling (GBP)

GBP 0.01

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Turkish Lira (TRY)

TRY 0.37

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Polish Zloty (PLN)

PLN 0.03

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Hungarian Forint (HUF)

HUF 2.45

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Czech Koruna (CZK)

CZK 0.16

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Norwegian Krone (NOK)

NOK 0.07

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Swedish Krona (SEK)

SEK 0.08

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Danish Krone (DKK)

DKK 0.05

1 Moonbeam (GLMR) to Romanian Leu (RON)

RON 0.04

About Moonbeam (GLMR)

Moonbeam is an Ethereum-compatible smart contract parachain on Polkadot that adds to the base Ethereum feature set with additional features including staking, cross-chain integrations and on-chain governance. The project aims to facilitate the usage of popular Ethereum developer tools and to overcome the scalability challenges caused by the constraints and costs of using the Ethereum network. Project connectivity and integration between Polkadot parachains and other chains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are provided by Moonbeam using bridges. The project’s native token GLMR, Glimmer, is used for paying transaction fees for accessing and supporting network operations, incentivising full nodes to maintain parachains, on-chain governance processes and more.

Explore other cryptocurrencies

Highest market cap

Cryptos with the highest market capitalisation

  • 600+ cryptoassets

    Buy, sell or swap cryptoassets from the UK's widest range of cryptoassets, including crypto indices and staking.

    Learn more
  • Invest your way

    Explore our exciting features, including staking, savings plans, limit orders, and more.

    Learn more
  • Safe and secure

    Safety is at the core of Bitpanda’s identity. With cutting-edge technology and a commitment to transparency, we give you the peace of mind to invest with confidence.

    Learn more
  • ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.

    Name

    Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH, Bitpanda GmbH

    Relevant legal entity identifier

    9845005X9B7N610K0093, 5493007WZ7IFULIL8G21

    Name of the crypto-asset

    Moonbeam

    Consensus Mechanism

    Moonbeam employs a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism combined with the Polkadot relay chain for enhanced scalability, finality, and security. It utilizes collators and validators, with finality provided by the GRANDPA finality gadget, ensuring deterministic block finality. Key Features of Moonbeam's Consensus Mechanism: 1. Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS): Collators and Validators: In Moonbeam’s DPoS system, collators maintain the parachain by collecting transactions from users and producing state transition proofs. The collator set is chosen based on the stake they have, including delegated stake. Delegation: Token holders can delegate their stake to collator candidates. The top collator candidates, including those with delegated stake, join the active set. Collators in the active set are randomly selected to produce blocks. Stakes and Block Production: Once a collator is in the active set, their total stake does not impact their chance of being selected to produce blocks. 2. Polkadot Relay Chain Integration: Moonbeam is built as a parachain on Polkadot, which provides shared security, scalability, and consensus. The relay chain validators ensure that Moonbeam’s blocks are validated and secured. 3. GRANDPA Finality: Deterministic Finality: Moonbeam relies on Polkadot’s GRANDPA finality gadget, which provides fast and deterministic finality for transactions. When a block is finalized, it cannot be reverted except through on-chain governance or forking. Parallel Finality: The finality process in Moonbeam occurs simultaneously with block production, unlike Ethereum, which has slower finality. GRANDPA allows for the quick confirmation of blocks, often within a single block on Moonbeam. 4. Block Production: Blocks are produced by collators who are selected based on their stake and delegated stake, contributing to the network’s decentralized nature.

    Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees

    Moonbeam incentivizes participation through staking rewards for collators and token holders, alongside transaction fees. Here's an overview of the incentive mechanism and applicable fees: Incentive Mechanism: 1. Collator Rewards: Block Rewards: Collators are rewarded with newly minted tokens for successfully producing and validating blocks. These rewards are distributed proportionally to the collators in the active set. Transaction Fees: Collators also earn transaction fees from the transactions included in the blocks they produce. These fees are paid by users to prioritize their transactions. 2. Delegation Rewards: Delegated Stake: Token holders can delegate their stake to collator candidates. By doing so, they share in the rewards earned by the collators to whom they delegate their tokens. This incentivizes the broader community to participate in governance and block production. Voting Power: Token holders who delegate their stake to collators help secure the network and participate in the selection of active collators. 3. Governance Participation: Voting on Network Proposals: Moonbeam uses its native tokens to allow participants to vote on governance proposals, helping to influence the future direction of the network and incentivizing active involvement in network management. Applicable Fees: 1. Transaction Fees: Fee Calculation: Transaction fees on Moonbeam are determined based on the complexity and size of the transaction. Users pay these fees in the native token (GLMR), which are distributed to the collators. Fee Distribution: The fees are split between collators, incentivizing them to process transactions efficiently. The amount of transaction fees can vary depending on network congestion and the size of the transaction. 2. Staking Fees: Collator Staking: Collators must stake a certain amount of tokens to be eligible for block production. They are incentivized with staking rewards and transaction fees for ensuring the network’s security and functionality. 3. Governance Fees: Voting Fees: Users may need to pay small fees to participate in governance, such as proposing changes or voting on proposals. These fees ensure governance is utilized effectively and prevents spam on the network.

    Beginning of the period

    2024-09-14

    End of the period

    2025-09-14

    Energy consumption

    65700.00000 (kWh/a)

  • Description

    Tokens in this category belong to networks designed to connect distinct blockchains. They aim to create an 'internet of blockchains' where disparate networks can communicate and exchange data. The native token is typically utilised for network security, governance, and the facilitation of connections between different chains, which are often referred to as 'parachains' or 'zones'.

    Risks

    Ecosystem Dependency. The value of these tokens is not derived from a single application but from the collective success of the connected ecosystem. If the projects building on the network fail to gain traction, or if developers migrate to a competitor ecosystem, the value of the interoperability token may decline significantly. The network effect is the primary driver of value, and losing it can be fatal.

    Bridge and Relay Risks. The core function of these networks is to bridge assets and data between chains. Cross-chain bridges are technically complex and have historically been prime targets for hackers due to the large liquidity pools they lock. A vulnerability in the central relay chain, the messaging protocol, or the bridge smart contracts could lead to a catastrophic failure across the entire connected network, resulting in the loss of bridged assets.

    Inflationary Tokenomics. To incentivise security and connectivity, these protocols often issue high rewards to stakers to attract capital. This results in a high structural inflation rate for the token supply. If the demand for the token does not outpace the new supply entering the market from staking rewards, the price of the token may suffer chronic downward pressure over time.

    Complexity of Security Models. These networks often employ 'shared security' or 'interchain security' models. These models are highly complex and largely untested at scale over long periods. A failure in the economic design of the shared security model could cascade failures across multiple connected blockchains simultaneously, and this could lead to a systemic collapse of the ecosystem.