Bitpanda logo
Enterprisenew
Log in
Sign-up
Bitpanda logo

Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 mins to learn more.

Eclipse

Eclipse price (ES)

Buying Eclipse (ES) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current ES value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about ES.

Buying Eclipse (ES) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current ES value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about ES.

€0.0008

-€0.0000-1.11 %
-€0.0000-1.11 %



This converter shows values for info only and doesn’t reflect actual transaction rates.

Last updated: 22/10/2026, 14:10:00

paypalvisamastercard

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Price of Eclipse today

Review the latest Eclipse price movements. Here is today’s trend at a glance: -1.11 %

Eclipse price statistics

Loading price statistics...

Eclipse market stats

  • Daily high

    €0.00

  • Daily low

    €0.00

  • Volatility (1M)

    36.50%

  • 52W High

    €0.15

  • 52W Low

    €0.00

  • Market cap

    €99.84K

Eclipse conversion table

1 EUR

1274.53 ES

5 EUR

6372.67 ES

10 EUR

12745.35 ES

15 EUR

19118.02 ES

20 EUR

25490.70 ES

25 EUR

31863.37 ES

1 Eclipse (ES) to Us Dollar (USD)

USD 0.00

1 Eclipse (ES) to Swiss Franc (CHF)

CHF 0.00

1 Eclipse (ES) to British Pound Sterling (GBP)

GBP 0.00

1 Eclipse (ES) to Turkish Lira (TRY)

TRY 0.04

1 Eclipse (ES) to Polish Zloty (PLN)

PLN 0.00

1 Eclipse (ES) to Hungarian Forint (HUF)

HUF 0.29

1 Eclipse (ES) to Czech Koruna (CZK)

CZK 0.02

1 Eclipse (ES) to Norwegian Krone (NOK)

NOK 0.01

1 Eclipse (ES) to Swedish Krona (SEK)

SEK 0.01

1 Eclipse (ES) to Danish Krone (DKK)

DKK 0.01

1 Eclipse (ES) to Romanian Leu (RON)

RON 0.00

About Eclipse (ES)

Eclipse is a Layer 2 network leveraging the Solana Virtual Machine for execution, Ethereum for settlement, and Celestia for data availability. Designed to scale Ethereum, Eclipse delivers higher throughput, reaching up to 9,000 TPS, supporting on-chain applications and driving the development of the Eclipse Economy with a Giga Scale Virtual Machine.

Explore other cryptocurrencies

Highest market cap

Cryptos with the highest market capitalisation

  • 600+ cryptoassets

    Buy, sell or swap cryptoassets from the UK's widest range of cryptoassets, including crypto indices and staking.

    Learn more
  • Invest your way

    Explore our exciting features, including staking, savings plans, limit orders, and more.

    Learn more
  • Safe and secure

    Safety is at the core of Bitpanda’s identity. With cutting-edge technology and a commitment to transparency, we give you the peace of mind to invest with confidence.

    Learn more
  • ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.

    Name

    Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH, Bitpanda GmbH

    Relevant legal entity identifier

    9845005X9B7N610K0093, 5493007WZ7IFULIL8G21

    Name of the crypto-asset

    eclipse

    Consensus Mechanism

    eclipse is present on the following networks: Ethereum, Solana. The crypto-asset's Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, introduced with The Merge in 2022, replaces mining with validator staking. Validators must stake at least 32 ETH every block a validator is randomly chosen to propose the next block. Once proposed the other validators verify the blocks integrity. The network operates on a slot and epoch system, where a new block is proposed every 12 seconds, and finalization occurs after two epochs (~12.8 minutes) using Casper-FFG. The Beacon Chain coordinates validators, while the fork-choice rule (LMD-GHOST) ensures the chain follows the heaviest accumulated validator votes. Validators earn rewards for proposing and verifying blocks, but face slashing for malicious behavior or inactivity. PoS aims to improve energy efficiency, security, and scalability, with future upgrades like Proto-Danksharding enhancing transaction efficiency. Solana uses a unique combination of Proof of History (PoH) and Proof of Stake (PoS) to achieve high throughput, low latency, and robust security. Here’s a detailed explanation of how these mechanisms work: Core Concepts 1. Proof of History (PoH): Time-Stamped Transactions: PoH is a cryptographic technique that timestamps transactions, creating a historical record that proves that an event has occurred at a specific moment in time. Verifiable Delay Function: PoH uses a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) to generate a unique hash that includes the transaction and the time it was processed. This sequence of hashes provides a verifiable order of events, enabling the network to efficiently agree on the sequence of transactions. 2. Proof of Stake (PoS): Validator Selection: Validators are chosen to produce new blocks based on the number of SOL tokens they have staked. The more tokens staked, the higher the chance of being selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks. Delegation: Token holders can delegate their SOL tokens to validators, earning rewards proportional to their stake while enhancing the network's security. Consensus Process 1. Transaction Validation: Transactions are broadcast to the network and collected by validators. Each transaction is validated to ensure it meets the network’s criteria, such as having correct signatures and sufficient funds. 2. PoH Sequence Generation: A validator generates a sequence of hashes using PoH, each containing a timestamp and the previous hash. This process creates a historical record of transactions, establishing a cryptographic clock for the network. 3. Block Production: The network uses PoS to select a leader validator based on their stake. The leader is responsible for bundling the validated transactions into a block. The leader validator uses the PoH sequence to order transactions within the block, ensuring that all transactions are processed in the correct order. 4. Consensus and Finalization: Other validators verify the block produced by the leader validator. They check the correctness of the PoH sequence and validate the transactions within the block. Once the block is verified, it is added to the blockchain. Validators sign off on the block, and it is considered finalized. Security and Economic Incentives 1. Incentives for Validators: Block Rewards: Validators earn rewards for producing and validating blocks. These rewards are distributed in SOL tokens and are proportional to the validator’s stake and performance. Transaction Fees: Validators also earn transaction fees from the transactions included in the blocks they produce. These fees provide an additional incentive for validators to process transactions efficiently. 2. Security: Staking: Validators must stake SOL tokens to participate in the consensus process. This staking acts as collateral, incentivizing validators to act honestly. If a validator behaves maliciously or fails to perform, they risk losing their staked tokens. Delegated Staking: Token holders can delegate their SOL tokens to validators, enhancing network security and decentralization. Delegators share in the rewards and are incentivized to choose reliable validators. 3. Economic Penalties: Slashing: Validators can be penalized for malicious behavior, such as double-signing or producing invalid blocks. This penalty, known as slashing, results in the loss of a portion of the staked tokens, discouraging dishonest actions.

    Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees

    eclipse is present on the following networks: Ethereum, Solana. The crypto-asset's PoS system secures transactions through validator incentives and economic penalties. Validators stake at least 32 ETH and earn rewards for proposing blocks, attesting to valid ones, and participating in sync committees. Rewards are paid in newly issued ETH and transaction fees. Under EIP-1559, transaction fees consist of a base fee, which is burned to reduce supply, and an optional priority fee (tip) paid to validators. Validators face slashing if they act maliciously and incur penalties for inactivity. This system aims to increase security by aligning incentives while making the crypto-asset's fee structure more predictable and deflationary during high network activity. Solana uses a combination of Proof of History (PoH) and Proof of Stake (PoS) to secure its network and validate transactions. Here’s a detailed explanation of the incentive mechanisms and applicable fees: Incentive Mechanisms 4. Validators: Staking Rewards: Validators are chosen based on the number of SOL tokens they have staked. They earn rewards for producing and validating blocks, which are distributed in SOL. The more tokens staked, the higher the chances of being selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks. Transaction Fees: Validators earn a portion of the transaction fees paid by users for the transactions they include in the blocks. This provides an additional financial incentive for validators to process transactions efficiently and maintain the network's integrity. 5. Delegators: Delegated Staking: Token holders who do not wish to run a validator node can delegate their SOL tokens to a validator. In return, delegators share in the rewards earned by the validators. This encourages widespread participation in securing the network and ensures decentralization. 6. Economic Security: Slashing: Validators can be penalized for malicious behavior, such as producing invalid blocks or being frequently offline. This penalty, known as slashing, involves the loss of a portion of their staked tokens. Slashing deters dishonest actions and ensures that validators act in the best interest of the network. Opportunity Cost: By staking SOL tokens, validators and delegators lock up their tokens, which could otherwise be used or sold. This opportunity cost incentivizes participants to act honestly to earn rewards and avoid penalties. Fees Applicable on the Solana Blockchain 7. Transaction Fees: Low and Predictable Fees: Solana is designed to handle a high throughput of transactions, which helps keep fees low and predictable. The average transaction fee on Solana is significantly lower compared to other blockchains like Ethereum. Fee Structure: Fees are paid in SOL and are used to compensate validators for the resources they expend to process transactions. This includes computational power and network bandwidth. 8. Rent Fees: State Storage: Solana charges rent fees for storing data on the blockchain. These fees are designed to discourage inefficient use of state storage and encourage developers to clean up unused state. Rent fees help maintain the efficiency and performance of the network. 9. Smart Contract Fees: Execution Costs: Similar to transaction fees, fees for deploying and interacting with smart contracts on Solana are based on the computational resources required. This ensures that users are charged proportionally for the resources they consume.

    Beginning of the period

    2024-09-10

    End of the period

    2025-09-10

    Energy consumption

    16.13971 (kWh/a)

  • Description

    Layer-2 networks, or 'rollups', are protocols built on top of a Layer-1 blockchain such as Ethereum. They are designed to process transactions off the main chain to increase speed and reduce costs while inheriting the security guarantees of the Layer-1. Users utilise Layer-2s to access decentralised finance (DeFi) and gaming applications with lower fees. Appchains are application-specific blockchains that may function similarly or as standalone chains with specific bridges.

    Risks

    Dependency on Layer-1. Layer-2 networks are entirely dependent on their underlying Layer-1 for finality and security. If the Layer-1 network suffers an outage, a reorganisation, or a censorship attack, the Layer-2 network will be directly affected. The Layer-2 cannot exist or secure funds without the liveness and security of the Layer-1.

    Sequencer Centralisation. Many Layer-2s currently rely on a single centralised 'sequencer' to order and process transactions. This sequencer is often operated by the project development team and creates a single point of failure. If the sequencer goes offline, the network may halt and prevent you from transacting. If the operator acts maliciously, they could potentially censor your transactions or exploit the order of trades for profit (MEV). While many Layer-2s plan to decentralise their sequencers, this remains a future roadmap item rather than a current reality for many.

    Bridge Security and Exit Timelines. To use a Layer-2, you must 'bridge' assets from the Layer-1. The smart contracts that hold these bridged assets are frequent targets for exploits. Additionally, moving funds back from a Layer-2 to the Layer-1 can be subject to long waiting periods. For 'optimistic rollups', this withdrawal period can last roughly seven days to allow for fraud proofs to be challenged. You may be unable to access your funds on the main chain during this time unless you use third-party liquidity providers, which introduce their own risks and fees.

    Upgradeability and Key Controls. Many Layer-2 networks are still in an experimental phase and developers often retain 'admin keys' or 'multisig controls' that allow them to upgrade the smart contracts instantly. While this allows for quick bug fixes, it also means the team could theoretically alter the protocol in a way that compromises user funds without community consent or prior warning.

    Data Availability Risks. Layer-2s must post transaction data to the Layer-1 to ensure security and state reconstruction. If the Layer-2 fails to post this data correctly, or if the data becomes unavailable due to technical failures, users may be unable to reconstruct the state of the Layer-2 and could lose access to their funds permanently.