Bitpanda logo
Enterprisenew
Log in
Sign-up
Bitpanda logo
Dash

Dash price (DASH)

Buying Dash (DASH) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current DASH value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about DASH.

Dash

Dash price (DASH)

Buying Dash (DASH) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current DASH value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about DASH.

€46.56

-€0.38-0.80 %
-€0.38-0.80 %



This converter shows values for info only and doesn’t reflect actual transaction rates.

Last updated: 14/09/2026, 14:40:00

paypalvisamastercard

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Price of Dash today

Review the latest Dash price movements. Here is today’s trend at a glance: -0.80 %

Dash price statistics

Loading price statistics...

Dash market stats

  • Daily high

    €47.66

  • Daily low

    €45.42

  • Volatility (1M)

    43.56%

  • 52W High

    €130.09

  • 52W Low

    €17.09

  • Market cap

    €591.80M

Dash conversion table

1 EUR

0.0215 DASH

5 EUR

0.1074 DASH

10 EUR

0.2148 DASH

15 EUR

0.3221 DASH

20 EUR

0.4295 DASH

25 EUR

0.5369 DASH

1 Dash (DASH) to Us Dollar (USD)

USD 54.03

1 Dash (DASH) to Swiss Franc (CHF)

CHF 44.12

1 Dash (DASH) to British Pound Sterling (GBP)

GBP 39.94

1 Dash (DASH) to Turkish Lira (TRY)

TRY 2,616.32

1 Dash (DASH) to Polish Zloty (PLN)

PLN 201.36

1 Dash (DASH) to Hungarian Forint (HUF)

HUF 16,937.03

1 Dash (DASH) to Czech Koruna (CZK)

CZK 1,129.35

1 Dash (DASH) to Norwegian Krone (NOK)

NOK 501.84

1 Dash (DASH) to Swedish Krona (SEK)

SEK 523.89

1 Dash (DASH) to Danish Krone (DKK)

DKK 348.18

1 Dash (DASH) to Romanian Leu (RON)

RON 244.74

About Dash (DASH)

DASH is based on Bitcoin, but offers some additional second layer improvements. Transactions are almost instantly confirmed by the Masternodes network, which incentivises its operators. This is an important difference to Bitcoin’s network, where confirmations can take longer, because all the work is done by the miners. Other than Bitcoin or Ethereum, DASH transactions are not pseudonymous, but – thanks to the PrivateSend-feature – fully anonymous.

Explore other cryptocurrencies

Highest market cap

Cryptos with the highest market capitalisation

  • 600+ cryptoassets

    Buy, sell or swap cryptoassets from the UK's widest range of cryptoassets, including crypto indices and staking.

    Learn more
  • Invest your way

    Explore our exciting features, including staking, savings plans, limit orders, and more.

    Learn more
  • Safe and secure

    Safety is at the core of Bitpanda’s identity. With cutting-edge technology and a commitment to transparency, we give you the peace of mind to invest with confidence.

    Learn more
  • ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.

    Name

    Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH, Bitpanda GmbH

    Relevant legal entity identifier

    9845005X9B7N610K0093, 5493007WZ7IFULIL8G21

    Name of the crypto-asset

    Dash

    Consensus Mechanism

    Dash is present on the following networks: Dash, Tron. Dash combines Proof of Work (PoW) for block production with a masternode network, which adds enhanced services and governance. This hybrid approach enables Dash to offer both secure transaction validation and additional features like fast payments. Core Components: 1. Proof of Work (PoW) with X11 Algorithm: Block Production: Miners use the X11 algorithm to solve cryptographic puzzles, with the first to solve adding the next block and receiving a block reward. 2. Masternode Network – Proof of Service (PoSe): Collateral Requirement: Operating a masternode requires locking 1,000 DASH, which acts as collateral to secure services provided by the node. Network Services: Masternodes support features such as InstantSend for rapid payments, PrivateSend for enhanced privacy, and governance. The Tron blockchain operates on a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism, designed to improve scalability, transaction speed, and energy efficiency. Here's a breakdown of how it works: 1. Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS): Tron uses DPoS, where token holders vote for a group of delegates known as Super Representatives (SRs)who are responsible for validating transactions and producing new blocks on the network. Token holders can vote for SRs based on their stake in the Tron network, and the top 27 SRs (or more, depending on the protocol version) are selected to participate in the block production process. SRs take turns producing blocks, which are added to the blockchain. This is done on a rotational basis to ensure decentralization and prevent control by a small group of validators. 2. Block Production: The Super Representatives generate new blocks and confirm transactions. The Tron blockchain achieves block finality quickly, with block production occurring every 3 seconds, making it highly efficient and capable of processing thousands of transactions per second. 3. Voting and Governance: Tron’s DPoS system also allows token holders to vote on important network decisions, such as protocol upgrades and changes to the system’s parameters. Voting power is proportional to the amount of TRX (Tron’s native token) that a user holds and chooses to stake. This provides a governance system where the community can actively participate in decision-making. 4. Super Representatives: The Super Representatives play a crucial role in maintaining the security and stability of the Tron blockchain. They are responsible for validating transactions, proposing new blocks, and ensuring the overall functionality of the network. Super Representatives are incentivized with block rewards (newly minted TRX tokens) and transaction feesfor their work.

    Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees

    Dash is present on the following networks: Dash, Tron. Dash rewards both miners and masternode operators to maintain network security and provide services, while also supporting community initiatives through a treasury fund. Incentive Mechanisms: 1. Block Reward Distribution: Miners: Receive 45% of each block reward for securing the network via PoW. Masternodes: Earn 45% of each block reward, incentivizing them to operate and support network services. Treasury Fund: 10% of each block reward is allocated to the Dash treasury, funding projects approved by the Dash DAO. 2. Masternode Staking and Rewards: Passive Income for Operators: By locking 1,000 DASH, masternode operators earn rewards for providing network services and participating in governance. Applicable Fees: 1. Transaction Fees: Standard Transactions: Users pay a small fee in DASH, making it suitable for daily transactions due to its low-cost structure. InstantSend Transactions: Available for a slightly higher fee, these transactions are processed immediately by masternodes for added security. The Tron blockchain uses a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism to secure its network and incentivize participation. Here's how the incentive mechanism and applicable fees work: Incentive Mechanism: 1. Super Representatives (SRs) Rewards: Block Rewards: Super Representatives (SRs), who are elected by TRX holders, are rewarded for producing blocks. Each block they produce comes with a block reward in the form of TRX tokens. Transaction Fees: In addition to block rewards, SRs receive transaction fees for validating transactions and including them in blocks. This ensures they are incentivized to process transactions efficiently. 2. Voting and Delegation: TRX Staking: TRX holders can stake their tokens and vote for Super Representatives (SRs). When TRX holders vote, they delegate their voting power to SRs, which allows SRs to earn rewards in the form of newly minted TRX tokens. Delegator Rewards: Token holders who delegate their votes to an SR can also receive a share of the rewards. This means delegators share in the block rewards and transaction fees that the SR earns. Incentivizing Participation: The more tokens a user stakes, the more voting power they have, which encourages participation in governance and network security. 3. Incentive for SRs: SRs are also incentivized to maintain the health and performance of the network. Their reputation and continued election depend on their ability to produce blocks consistently and efficiently process transactions. Applicable Fees: 1. Transaction Fees: Fee Calculation: Users must pay transaction fees to have their transactions processed. The transaction fee varies based on the complexity of the transaction and the network's current demand. This is paid in TRX tokens. Transaction Fee Distribution: Transaction fees are distributed to Super Representatives (SRs), giving them an ongoing income to maintain and support the network. 2. Storage Fees: Tron charges storage fees for data storage on the blockchain. This includes storing smart contracts, tokens, and other data on the network. Users are required to pay these fees in TRX tokens to store data. 3. Energy and Bandwidth: Energy: Tron uses a resource model that allows users to access network resources like bandwidth and energy through staking. Users who stake their TRX tokens receive "energy," which is required to execute transactions and interact with smart contracts. Bandwidth: Each user is allocated a certain amount of bandwidth based on their TRX holdings. If users exceed their allotted bandwidth, they can pay for additional bandwidth in TRX tokens.

    Beginning of the period

    2024-09-09

    End of the period

    2025-09-09

    Energy consumption

    67500000.79408 (kWh/a)

    Energy consumption resources and methodologies

    The energy consumption of this asset is aggregated across multiple components: For the calculation of energy consumptions, the so called 'bottom-up' approach is being used. The nodes are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. These assumptions are made on the basis of empirical findings through the use of public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. The main determinants for estimating the hardware used within the network are the requirements for operating the client software. The energy consumption of the hardware devices was measured in certified test laboratories. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts. To determine the energy consumption of a token, the energy consumption of the network(s) tron is calculated first. For the energy consumption of the token, a fraction of the energy consumption of the network is attributed to the token, which is determined based on the activity of the crypto-asset within the network. When calculating the energy consumption, the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) is used - if available - to determine all implementations of the asset in scope. The mappings are updated regularly, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts.

    Renewable energy consumption

    29.306425031 (%)

    Energy intensity

    0.24658 (kWh)

    Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions - Controlled

    0.00000 (tCO2e/a)

    Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions - Purchased

    27809.73445 (tCO2e/a)

    GHG intensity

    0.10159 (kgCO2e)

    Key energy sources and methodologies

    To determine the proportion of renewable energy usage, the locations of the nodes are to be determined using public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. If no information is available on the geographic distribution of the nodes, reference networks are used which are comparable in terms of their incentivization structure and consensus mechanism. This geo-information is merged with public information from Our World in Data, see citation. The intensity is calculated as the marginal energy cost wrt. one more transaction. Ember (2025); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2024) - with major processing by Our World in Data. “Share of electricity generated by renewables - Ember and Energy Institute” [dataset]. Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data Europe”; Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data”; Energy Institute, “Statistical Review of World Energy” [original data]. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-electricity-renewables.

    Key GHG sources and methodologies

    To determine the GHG Emissions, the locations of the nodes are to be determined using public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. If no information is available on the geographic distribution of the nodes, reference networks are used which are comparable in terms of their incentivization structure and consensus mechanism. This geo-information is merged with public information from Our World in Data, see citation. The intensity is calculated as the marginal emission wrt. one more transaction. Ember (2025); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2024) - with major processing by Our World in Data. “Carbon intensity of electricity generation - Ember and Energy Institute” [dataset]. Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data Europe”; Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data”; Energy Institute, “Statistical Review of World Energy” [original data]. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-intensity-electricity Licenced under CC BY 4.0.

  • Description

    These assets function as the native currency of a Layer-1 blockchain. They were created primarily to facilitate the transfer of value across a decentralised network without the need for intermediaries such as banks or payment processors. Users typically hold these assets to store value outside of the traditional financial system, hedge against inflation, or make peer-to-peer payments.

    Risks

    Volatility and Valuation Models. The value of these assets is not derived from traditional financial metrics such as revenue, dividends, cash flow, or interest rates. Unlike equities or bonds, there is no underlying balance sheet or earnings report to anchor the valuation. Instead, value depends heavily on network adoption, security hashrate, public perception, and speculative supply and demand dynamics. Consequently, prices can be extremely volatile and may react sharply to news cycles, macroeconomic shifts, regulatory announcements, or changes in investor sentiment. It is common for these assets to experience significant percentage fluctuations within a single trading day.

    Consensus Mechanism Risks. Many payments-focused blockchains utilise a Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism. While robust, these networks are susceptible to a '51% attack'. This occurs if a single malicious actor or a colluding group of miners gains control of more than half of the network's mining power. If successful, the attacker could disrupt the network, prevent new transactions from gaining confirmations, reverse transactions completed while they were in control, and double-spend tokens. Smaller PoW networks face a significantly higher probability of such attacks.

    Scaling and Transaction Costs. These networks often prioritise security and decentralisation over transaction throughput. During periods of high global demand, the network's waiting area for unconfirmed transactions (mempool) may become congested. This results in a competitive fee market where users must pay increasingly higher fees to have their transactions prioritised by miners. This congestion can lead to significant delays in transaction processing times and a sharp increase in transaction fees. Users may find it prohibitively expensive or slow to move assets when they need them most, particularly during periods of market panic.

    Environmental Impact and Regulatory Scrutiny. PoW networks consume vast amounts of electrical energy to secure the ledger. This high energy consumption has led to criticism from environmental groups and policymakers. There is a tangible risk of regulatory crackdowns, carbon taxes, or outright bans on mining operations in various jurisdictions. Such regulatory interventions could destabilise the network by reducing the security hashrate or limiting the asset's integration with the traditional financial system and ESG-focused institutional investors.

    Limited Upgradability. Due to their decentralised nature and reliance on broad consensus among thousands of independent node operators for protocol changes, these networks can be slow to upgrade. This rigidity may prevent the protocol from adapting to new technical threats or implementing desirable features found in newer, more agile blockchains. This could lead to a gradual loss of market share and value over time as users migrate to more technologically advanced alternatives.

    Finality Risk. Transactions on PoW blockchains are probabilistic rather than deterministic. While a transaction may appear confirmed after being included in a block, there is always a theoretical risk of a 'chain reorganisation' where a competing chain with more accumulated proof-of-work becomes the definitive chain. This event could result in previously confirmed transactions being reversed or erased from the ledger.