Bitpanda logo
Enterprisenew
Log in
Sign-up
Bitpanda logo
COTI

COTI price (COTI)

Buying COTI (COTI) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current COTI value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about COTI.

COTI

COTI price (COTI)

Buying COTI (COTI) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current COTI value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about COTI.

€0.0150

€0.0002+1.50 %
€0.0002+1.50 %



This converter shows values for info only and doesn’t reflect actual transaction rates.

Last updated: 13/09/2026, 02:30:00

paypalvisamastercard

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Price of COTI today

Review the latest COTI price movements. Here is today’s trend at a glance: +1.50 %

COTI price statistics

Loading price statistics...

COTI market stats

  • Daily high

    €0.02

  • Daily low

    €0.01

  • Volatility (1M)

    28.89%

  • 52W High

    €0.05

  • 52W Low

    €0.01

  • Market cap

    €41.17M

COTI conversion table

1 EUR

66.72 COTI

5 EUR

333.62 COTI

10 EUR

667.24 COTI

15 EUR

1000.86 COTI

20 EUR

1334.48 COTI

25 EUR

1668.10 COTI

1 Coti (COTI) to Us Dollar (USD)

USD 0.02

1 Coti (COTI) to Swiss Franc (CHF)

CHF 0.01

1 Coti (COTI) to British Pound Sterling (GBP)

GBP 0.01

1 Coti (COTI) to Turkish Lira (TRY)

TRY 0.84

1 Coti (COTI) to Polish Zloty (PLN)

PLN 0.06

1 Coti (COTI) to Hungarian Forint (HUF)

HUF 5.45

1 Coti (COTI) to Czech Koruna (CZK)

CZK 0.36

1 Coti (COTI) to Norwegian Krone (NOK)

NOK 0.16

1 Coti (COTI) to Swedish Krona (SEK)

SEK 0.17

1 Coti (COTI) to Danish Krone (DKK)

DKK 0.11

1 Coti (COTI) to Romanian Leu (RON)

RON 0.08

About COTI (COTI)

The blockchain protocol behind COTI is aiming to optimise decentralised payments and its platform allows for companies, payment DApps, governments, merchants and issuers and stablecoin founders to easily create advanced digital products and payment solutions of their own, including the digitalisation of any currency in order to enable global inclusion in finance. Online payments as well as offline payments including crypto, stablecoins, credit cards and native coins can be processed by COTI pay. COTI is based on a DAG structure and utilises a Proof of Trust (Trustchain) consensus algorithm. COTI coins can be used for payments, application fees, network fees and token staking.

Explore other cryptocurrencies

Highest market cap

Cryptos with the highest market capitalisation

  • 600+ cryptoassets

    Buy, sell or swap cryptoassets from the UK's widest range of cryptoassets, including crypto indices and staking.

    Learn more
  • Invest your way

    Explore our exciting features, including staking, savings plans, limit orders, and more.

    Learn more
  • Safe and secure

    Safety is at the core of Bitpanda’s identity. With cutting-edge technology and a commitment to transparency, we give you the peace of mind to invest with confidence.

    Learn more
  • ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.

    Name

    Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH, Bitpanda GmbH

    Relevant legal entity identifier

    9845005X9B7N610K0093, 5493007WZ7IFULIL8G21

    Name of the crypto-asset

    COTI Token

    Consensus Mechanism

    COTI Token is present on the following networks: Binance Beacon Chain, Binance Smart Chain, Ethereum. Binance Beacon Chain operated on a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism before its operations were discontinued in fall 2024 and its migration to Binance Smart Chain; validators were elected by token holders through staking and voting, limiting active participation to a manageable number of nodes while maintaining decentralization; validators were selected based on the staking weight of their delegators, ensuring stakeholder interests were proportionally represented in the validation process; regular validator rotation was implemented to promote fairness and decentralization by allowing multiple participants to contribute to the network; the system was designed to tolerate some degree of validator failures while maintaining the network’s operational integrity, ensuring resilience. Binance Smart Chain (BSC) uses a hybrid consensus mechanism called Proof of Staked Authority (PoSA), which combines elements of Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) and Proof of Authority (PoA). This method ensures fast block times and low fees while maintaining a level of decentralization and security. Core Components 1. Validators (so-called “Cabinet Members”): Validators on BSC are responsible for producing new blocks, validating transactions, and maintaining the network’s security. To become a validator, an entity must stake a significant amount of BNB (Binance Coin). Validators are selected through staking and voting by token holders. There are 21 active validators at any given time, rotating to ensure decentralization and security. 2. Delegators: Token holders who do not wish to run validator nodes can delegate their BNB tokens to validators. This delegation helps validators increase their stake and improves their chances of being selected to produce blocks. Delegators earn a share of the rewards that validators receive, incentivizing broad participation in network security. 3. Candidates: Candidates are nodes that have staked the required amount of BNB and are in the pool waiting to become validators. They are essentially potential validators who are not currently active but can be elected to the validator set through community voting. Candidates play a crucial role in ensuring there is always a sufficient pool of nodes ready to take on validation tasks, thus maintaining network resilience and decentralization. Consensus Process 4. Validator Selection: Validators are chosen based on the amount of BNB staked and votes received from delegators. The more BNB staked and votes received, the higher the chance of being selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks. The selection process involves both the current validators and the pool of candidates, ensuring a dynamic and secure rotation of nodes. 5. Block Production: The selected validators take turns producing blocks in a PoA-like manner, ensuring that blocks are generated quickly and efficiently. Validators validate transactions, add them to new blocks, and broadcast these blocks to the network. 6. Transaction Finality: BSC achieves fast block times of around 3 seconds and quick transaction finality. This is achieved through the efficient PoSA mechanism that allows validators to rapidly reach consensus. Security and Economic Incentives 7. Staking: Validators are required to stake a substantial amount of BNB, which acts as collateral to ensure their honest behavior. This staked amount can be slashed if validators act maliciously. Staking incentivizes validators to act in the network's best interest to avoid losing their staked BNB. 8. Delegation and Rewards: Delegators earn rewards proportional to their stake in validators. This incentivizes them to choose reliable validators and participate in the network’s security. Validators and delegators share transaction fees as rewards, which provides continuous economic incentives to maintain network security and performance. 9. Transaction Fees: BSC employs low transaction fees, paid in BNB, making it cost-effective for users. These fees are collected by validators as part of their rewards, further incentivizing them to validate transactions accurately and efficiently. The crypto-asset's Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, introduced with The Merge in 2022, replaces mining with validator staking. Validators must stake at least 32 ETH every block a validator is randomly chosen to propose the next block. Once proposed the other validators verify the blocks integrity. The network operates on a slot and epoch system, where a new block is proposed every 12 seconds, and finalization occurs after two epochs (~12.8 minutes) using Casper-FFG. The Beacon Chain coordinates validators, while the fork-choice rule (LMD-GHOST) ensures the chain follows the heaviest accumulated validator votes. Validators earn rewards for proposing and verifying blocks, but face slashing for malicious behavior or inactivity. PoS aims to improve energy efficiency, security, and scalability, with future upgrades like Proto-Danksharding enhancing transaction efficiency.

    Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees

    COTI Token is present on the following networks: Binance Beacon Chain, Binance Smart Chain, Ethereum. The Binance Beacon Chain incentivized validators and ensured fee transparency before its migration to Binance Smart Chain; validators were rewarded solely through transaction fees, with no block rewards provided, aligning incentives with network usage and transaction volume; transaction fees were calculated and displayed upfront, ensuring clarity for users and promoting trust in the fee structure; a portion of transaction fees collected in BNB was burned, reducing the overall token supply and contributing to a deflationary economic model. Binance Smart Chain (BSC) uses the Proof of Staked Authority (PoSA) consensus mechanism to ensure network security and incentivize participation from validators and delegators. Incentive Mechanisms 1. Validators: Staking Rewards: Validators must stake a significant amount of BNB to participate in the consensus process. They earn rewards in the form of transaction fees and block rewards. Selection Process: Validators are selected based on the amount of BNB staked and the votes received from delegators. The more BNB staked and votes received, the higher the chances of being selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks. 2. Delegators: Delegated Staking: Token holders can delegate their BNB to validators. This delegation increases the validator's total stake and improves their chances of being selected to produce blocks. Shared Rewards: Delegators earn a portion of the rewards that validators receive. This incentivizes token holders to participate in the network’s security and decentralization by choosing reliable validators. 3. Candidates: Pool of Potential Validators: Candidates are nodes that have staked the required amount of BNB and are waiting to become active validators. They ensure that there is always a sufficient pool of nodes ready to take on validation tasks, maintaining network resilience. 4. Economic Security: Slashing: Validators can be penalized for malicious behavior or failure to perform their duties. Penalties include slashing a portion of their staked tokens, ensuring that validators act in the best interest of the network. Opportunity Cost: Staking requires validators and delegators to lock up their BNB tokens, providing an economic incentive to act honestly to avoid losing their staked assets. Fees on the Binance Smart Chain 5. Transaction Fees: Low Fees: BSC is known for its low transaction fees compared to other blockchain networks. These fees are paid in BNB and are essential for maintaining network operations and compensating validators. Dynamic Fee Structure: Transaction fees can vary based on network congestion and the complexity of the transactions. However, BSC ensures that fees remain significantly lower than those on the Ethereum mainnet. 6. Block Rewards: Incentivizing Validators: Validators earn block rewards in addition to transaction fees. These rewards are distributed to validators for their role in maintaining the network and processing transactions. 7. Cross-Chain Fees: Interoperability Costs: BSC supports cross-chain compatibility, allowing assets to be transferred between Binance Chain and Binance Smart Chain. These cross-chain operations incur minimal fees, facilitating seamless asset transfers and improving user experience. 8. Smart Contract Fees: Deployment and Execution Costs: Deploying and interacting with smart contracts on BSC involves paying fees based on the computational resources required. These fees are also paid in BNB and are designed to be cost-effective, encouraging developers to build on the BSC platform. The crypto-asset's PoS system secures transactions through validator incentives and economic penalties. Validators stake at least 32 ETH and earn rewards for proposing blocks, attesting to valid ones, and participating in sync committees. Rewards are paid in newly issued ETH and transaction fees. Under EIP-1559, transaction fees consist of a base fee, which is burned to reduce supply, and an optional priority fee (tip) paid to validators. Validators face slashing if they act maliciously and incur penalties for inactivity. This system aims to increase security by aligning incentives while making the crypto-asset's fee structure more predictable and deflationary during high network activity.

    Beginning of the period

    2024-09-10

    End of the period

    2025-09-10

    Energy consumption

    118.36678 (kWh/a)

  • Description

    Layer-2 networks, or 'rollups', are protocols built on top of a Layer-1 blockchain such as Ethereum. They are designed to process transactions off the main chain to increase speed and reduce costs while inheriting the security guarantees of the Layer-1. Users utilise Layer-2s to access decentralised finance (DeFi) and gaming applications with lower fees. Appchains are application-specific blockchains that may function similarly or as standalone chains with specific bridges.

    Risks

    Dependency on Layer-1. Layer-2 networks are entirely dependent on their underlying Layer-1 for finality and security. If the Layer-1 network suffers an outage, a reorganisation, or a censorship attack, the Layer-2 network will be directly affected. The Layer-2 cannot exist or secure funds without the liveness and security of the Layer-1.

    Sequencer Centralisation. Many Layer-2s currently rely on a single centralised 'sequencer' to order and process transactions. This sequencer is often operated by the project development team and creates a single point of failure. If the sequencer goes offline, the network may halt and prevent you from transacting. If the operator acts maliciously, they could potentially censor your transactions or exploit the order of trades for profit (MEV). While many Layer-2s plan to decentralise their sequencers, this remains a future roadmap item rather than a current reality for many.

    Bridge Security and Exit Timelines. To use a Layer-2, you must 'bridge' assets from the Layer-1. The smart contracts that hold these bridged assets are frequent targets for exploits. Additionally, moving funds back from a Layer-2 to the Layer-1 can be subject to long waiting periods. For 'optimistic rollups', this withdrawal period can last roughly seven days to allow for fraud proofs to be challenged. You may be unable to access your funds on the main chain during this time unless you use third-party liquidity providers, which introduce their own risks and fees.

    Upgradeability and Key Controls. Many Layer-2 networks are still in an experimental phase and developers often retain 'admin keys' or 'multisig controls' that allow them to upgrade the smart contracts instantly. While this allows for quick bug fixes, it also means the team could theoretically alter the protocol in a way that compromises user funds without community consent or prior warning.

    Data Availability Risks. Layer-2s must post transaction data to the Layer-1 to ensure security and state reconstruction. If the Layer-2 fails to post this data correctly, or if the data becomes unavailable due to technical failures, users may be unable to reconstruct the state of the Layer-2 and could lose access to their funds permanently.