Bitpanda logo
Enterprisenew
Log in
Sign-up
Bitpanda logo
Core Dao

Core Dao price (CORE)

Buying Core Dao (CORE) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current CORE value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about CORE.

Buying Core Dao (CORE) on Bitpanda is easy, fast, and secure. Check the current CORE value and live chart in GBP and get to know more about CORE.

€0.0205

-€0.0003-1.48 %
-€0.0003-1.48 %



This converter shows values for info only and doesn’t reflect actual transaction rates.

Last updated: 25/09/2026, 18:10:00

paypalvisamastercard

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Figures shown refer to the past, and are based on gross performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, and fees will reduce your net returns. Reference period: last 24 hours. Source: Bitpanda, based on prices from multiple trading venues. Please review the risk disclosure before investing.

Price of Core Dao today

Review the latest Core Dao price movements. Here is today’s trend at a glance: -1.48 %

Core Dao price statistics

Loading price statistics...

Core Dao market stats

  • Daily high

    €0.02

  • Daily low

    €0.02

  • Volatility (1M)

    24.80%

  • 52W High

    €0.36

  • 52W Low

    €0.01

  • Market cap

    €22.30M

Core Dao conversion table

1 EUR

48.67 CORE

5 EUR

243.36 CORE

10 EUR

486.72 CORE

15 EUR

730.08 CORE

20 EUR

973.44 CORE

25 EUR

1216.79 CORE

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Us Dollar (USD)

USD 0.02

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Swiss Franc (CHF)

CHF 0.02

1 Core Dao (CORE) to British Pound Sterling (GBP)

GBP 0.02

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Turkish Lira (TRY)

TRY 1.15

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Polish Zloty (PLN)

PLN 0.09

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Hungarian Forint (HUF)

HUF 7.50

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Czech Koruna (CZK)

CZK 0.50

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Norwegian Krone (NOK)

NOK 0.22

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Swedish Krona (SEK)

SEK 0.23

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Danish Krone (DKK)

DKK 0.15

1 Core Dao (CORE) to Romanian Leu (RON)

RON 0.11

About Core Dao (CORE)

CORE is the native coin of the Core DAO, an EVM-Compatible L1 blockchain, which is powered by its novel consensus mechanism called ‘Satoshi Plus’. Core aims to solve the blockchain 'trilemma' – scalable, secure, decentralised – by merging the composability of an EVM chain with the decentralisation and security of Bitcoin. Core DAO’s ultimate goal is to build the strongest and most inclusive community in Web 3 for both developers and users.

Explore other cryptocurrencies

Highest market cap

Cryptos with the highest market capitalisation

  • 600+ cryptoassets

    Buy, sell or swap cryptoassets from the UK's widest range of cryptoassets, including crypto indices and staking.

    Learn more
  • Invest your way

    Explore our exciting features, including staking, savings plans, limit orders, and more.

    Learn more
  • Safe and secure

    Safety is at the core of Bitpanda’s identity. With cutting-edge technology and a commitment to transparency, we give you the peace of mind to invest with confidence.

    Learn more
  • ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) regulations for crypto assets aim to address their environmental impact (e.g., energy-intensive mining), promote transparency, and ensure ethical governance practices to align the crypto industry with broader sustainability and societal goals. These regulations encourage compliance with standards that mitigate risks and foster trust in digital assets.

    Name

    Bitpanda Asset Management GmbH, Bitpanda GmbH

    Relevant legal entity identifier

    9845005X9B7N610K0093, 5493007WZ7IFULIL8G21

    Name of the crypto-asset

    Core

    Consensus Mechanism

    Core employs the Satoshi Plus consensus mechanism, which combines Delegated Proof of Work (DPoW), Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS), and Non-Custodial Bitcoin Staking to provide robust security and scalability. Core Components: Delegated Proof of Work (DPoW): Integrates Bitcoin miners into the network by allowing them to contribute hash power to secure Core, without interfering with Bitcoin's primary operations. Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS): CORE token holders delegate their tokens to validators who handle block production and transaction validation, ensuring efficiency and decentralization. Non-Custodial Bitcoin Staking: Bitcoin holders can stake their BTC to participate in the network consensus, adding an extra layer of security while preserving ownership of their assets.

    Incentive Mechanisms and Applicable Fees

    Core incentivizes network participation through staking rewards, transaction fees, and governance opportunities. Incentive Mechanisms: Validator Rewards: Validators earn rewards from transaction fees and newly minted CORE tokens distributed through the blockchain's inflation policy, with payouts proportional to their delegated hash power and CORE stake. Staking Incentives: Both CORE and Bitcoin stakers receive rewards for contributing to network security and stability, encouraging broader participation across asset classes. Governance Participation: CORE token holders have voting rights, allowing them to influence protocol upgrades and network parameters, supporting decentralized decision-making. Applicable Fees: Transaction Fees: Users pay transaction fees in CORE tokens for executing transactions and smart contracts. These fees are distributed to validators as compensation for securing the network. Inflation Policy: A portion of validator rewards comes from newly minted CORE tokens, providing an additional incentive while maintaining a controlled inflation model.

    Beginning of the period

    2024-09-09

    End of the period

    2025-09-09

    Energy consumption

    159898098.67219 (kWh/a)

    Energy consumption resources and methodologies

    For the calculation of energy consumptions, the so called 'bottom-up' approach is being used. The nodes are considered to be the central factor for the energy consumption of the network. These assumptions are made on the basis of empirical findings through the use of public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. The main determinants for estimating the hardware used within the network are the requirements for operating the client software. The energy consumption of the hardware devices was measured in certified test laboratories. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation. The information regarding the hardware used and the number of participants in the network is based on assumptions that are verified with best effort using empirical data. In general, participants are assumed to be largely economically rational. As a precautionary principle, we make assumptions on the conservative side when in doubt, i.e. making higher estimates for the adverse impacts.

    Renewable energy consumption

    29.306425042 (%)

    Energy intensity

    0.07066 (kWh)

    Scope 1 DLT GHG emissions - Controlled

    0.00000 (tCO2e/a)

    Scope 2 DLT GHG emissions - Purchased

    65877.38687 (tCO2e/a)

    GHG intensity

    0.02911 (kgCO2e)

    Key energy sources and methodologies

    To determine the proportion of renewable energy usage, the locations of the nodes are to be determined using public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. If no information is available on the geographic distribution of the nodes, reference networks are used which are comparable in terms of their incentivization structure and consensus mechanism. This geo-information is merged with public information from Our World in Data, see citation. The intensity is calculated as the marginal energy cost wrt. one more transaction. Ember (2025); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2024) - with major processing by Our World in Data. “Share of electricity generated by renewables - Ember and Energy Institute” [dataset]. Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data Europe”; Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data”; Energy Institute, “Statistical Review of World Energy” [original data]. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-electricity-renewables.

    Key GHG sources and methodologies

    To determine the GHG Emissions, the locations of the nodes are to be determined using public information sites, open-source crawlers and crawlers developed in-house. If no information is available on the geographic distribution of the nodes, reference networks are used which are comparable in terms of their incentivization structure and consensus mechanism. This geo-information is merged with public information from Our World in Data, see citation. The intensity is calculated as the marginal emission wrt. one more transaction. Ember (2025); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2024) - with major processing by Our World in Data. “Carbon intensity of electricity generation - Ember and Energy Institute” [dataset]. Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data Europe”; Ember, “Yearly Electricity Data”; Energy Institute, “Statistical Review of World Energy” [original data]. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-intensity-electricity Licenced under CC BY 4.0.

  • Description

    These tokens are the native assets for programmable blockchains. Unlike payments-focused chains, these platforms act as 'world computers' that host decentralised applications (dApps), smartcontracts, and other digital assets. The native token is used to pay for computation fees, known as 'gas', and to secure the network via staking. Users hold these tokens to interact with the ecosystem of applications, earn staking yields, or speculate on the growth of the platform's digital economy.

    Risks

    Gas fee volatility. The cost to transact on these networks is driven by the demand for block space and computational resources. During popular token launches, NFT mints, or periods of high network activity, gas fees can spike to extreme levels. The cost of the transaction fee may exceed the value of the assets you wish to move, and this effectively renders small balances illiquid during peak times.

    Smart contract vulnerabilities. These platforms support complex programming, and this increases the 'attack surface' for hackers. While the Layer-1 blockchain consensus layer itself may be secure, the applications built on top of it often contain coding errors, logic bugs, or economic exploits. If you interact with these applications, you may lose your funds due to hacks, exploits, or unintended code execution.

    Validator and staking risks. Most smart contract platforms use Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanisms. This requires network validators to lock up capital to secure the chain. If a validator behaves maliciously or suffers from technical downtime, the protocol may confiscate a portion of their staked funds. This penalty is known as 'slashing'. If you delegate your tokens to a validator that gets slashed, you may lose a portion of your investment principal.

    Centralisation and governance. Some smart contract blockchains rely on a small number of validators or high hardware requirements to process transactions quickly. This creates a risk of centralisation where a few large entities could collude to censor transactions or halt the chain. Additionally, the governance of these protocols often favours large token holders (known as 'whales') or early investors. This means your ability as a retail investor to influence the direction of the platform or vote on critical protocol upgrades may be negligible.